Prediction of Glenn Layendecker vs Paul Mcnamee Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
G. Layendecker vs P. Mcnamee

Glenn Layendecker

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'1" (185 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Left-Handed

Plays

Paul Mcnamee

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'1" (185 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Left-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Layendecker 1 - 0 Mcnamee

They have played 2 sets in total, with Glenn Layendecker winning 2 and Paul Mcnamee winning 0. The last match between Glenn Layendecker and Paul Mcnamee was at the Sydney Indoor, 13-10-1986, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Glenn Layendecker getting the victory 6-1 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Layendecker	1
Mcnamee	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Sydney Indoor(10-13-86)

Stats

Glenn Layendecker

Paul Mcnamee

G. Layendecker vs P. Mcnamee H2H Profile

G. Layendecker	Stats	P. Mcnamee
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
46.22% (104-121)	Career Total W/L	52.74% (260-233)
1	Hard	0
2	Titles	4
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

G. Layendecker vs P. Mcnamee Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Glenn Layendecker has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Paul Mcnamee has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Glenn Layendecker, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Paul Mcnamee has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Glenn Layendecker has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paul Mcnamee has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Glenn Layendecker has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Paul Mcnamee winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Glenn Layendecker has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 80% (W/L 4/1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 23% (W/L 3/10). Paul Mcnamee has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 80% (W/L 63/49), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 35/39).
Player level: In the last year, Glenn Layendecker has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Paul Mcnamee has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Glenn Layendecker winning 1 times and Paul Mcnamee being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Glenn Layendecker winning 2 and Paul Mcnamee winning 0.
The last match between Glenn Layendecker and Paul Mcnamee was at the Sydney Indoor, 13-10-1986, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Glenn Layendecker getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Glenn Layendecker has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Paul Mcnamee has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Glenn Layendecker has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paul Mcnamee has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Glenn Layendecker has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paul Mcnamee has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Glenn Layendecker vs Paul Mcnamee Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

G. Layendecker vs P. Mcnamee H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

G. Layendecker	Stats	P. Mcnamee
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	4
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

G. Layendecker Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Gstaad - 06-07-1992
R1 Sergio BrugueraS. Bruguera	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Scottsdale - 24-02-1992
R1 Brian DunnB. Dunn	W	6-1 6-3	Stats
R2 Brad GilbertB. Gilbert	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Philadelphia - 17-02-1992
R1 Stephane SimianS. Simian	W	3-6 6-4 6-2	Stats
R2 Brad GilbertB. Gilbert	L	6-2 6-4	Stats

View All

P. Mcnamee Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Australian Open - 11-01-1988
R2 Sammy Giammalva JrS. Giammalva	W	6-7 7-6 6-2 4-1 RET	Stats
R1 Bill ScanlonB. Scanlon	W	6-3 6-3 6-3	Stats
R3 Pat CashP. Cash	L	6-1 6-2 6-1	Stats
Adelaide - 28-12-1987
R3 Charles Bud CoxC. Bud	W	6-1 6-2	Stats
R4 Wally MasurW. Masur	L	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

G. Layendecker vs P. Mcnamee Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

G. Layendecker	Stats	P. Mcnamee
46.22% (104/121)	YTD Win/Loss	52.74% (260/233)
46.61% (268/307)	Sets Win/Loss	51.88% (662/614)
48.82% (2777/2911)	Games Win/Loss	50.55% (6201/6067)
49.61% (63/64)	Hard Win/Loss	47.30% (35/39)
23.08% (3/10)	Clay Win/Loss	53.16% (126/111)
45.24% (19/23)	Indoor Hard W/L	51.43% (36/34)
44.19% (19/24)	Grass Win/Loss	56.25% (63/49)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
329.08	Average Opponent Rank	0.26
25.00% (6/18)	Slam W/L	53.57% (45/39)
31.25% (5/11)	Masters W/L	48.00% (12/13)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	64.71% (11/6)
46.85% (67/76)	Main Tour W/L	50.57% (178/174)
61.90% (26/16)	Challenger W/L	93.33% (14/1)
49% (97/197)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	53% (204/387)
25% (7/28)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	54% (55/102)
50% (4/8)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
53% (41/78)	Deciding Set Win %	52% (74/143)
76% (96/73)	1st Set Won, Won Match	86% (258/221)
24% (96/23)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (258/36)
24% (129/31)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (234/40)